On 1 December 2015 at 02:40, Neil Jerram <neil.jer...@metaswitch.com> wrote:
> On 01/12/15 05:16, Doug Wiegley wrote: > > Part of the issue is that in a year, we added all the repos above. And > > all of said repos were all heading over to infra with the same newbie > > questions/mistakes. Not a bad thing in and of itself, but the sheer > > volume was causing a lot of infra load. So the infra liasions are > > meant to buffer that; exactly the opposite of splitting again. Now add > > that many repos again this year, and the problem doubles. The review > > overhead for centralizing this is quite small. The mentor overhead to > > avoid the repeated mistakes hitting infra is quite a bit higher, but > > that has to land somewhere, and still isn’t huge. > > On the other hand, it may also be that we're very unlikely to see so > many new projects again, as we have in the first 'stadium' (half-)year. > So if this is a significant aspect of the pain that Armando is > describing, I suspect it would be overreaction to make a big governance > change for it - as it's unlikely to happen again. > I don't think we're nearly reached the inflection point. > > But actually I guess most of the pain is elsewhere, i.e. in the > cognitive aspect of the Neutron PTL logically needing to understand > everything in all of the stadium projects. > > Neil > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
