On 20.11.2015 17:41, Bogdan Dobrelya wrote: >> Hi, >> >> let me try to rephrase this a bit and Bogdan will correct me if I'm wrong >> or missing something. >> >> We have a set of top-scope manifests (called Fuel puppet tasks) that we use >> for OpenStack deployment. We execute those tasks with "puppet apply". Each >> task supposed to bring target system into some desired state, so puppet >> compiles a catalog and applies it. So basically, puppet catalog = desired >> system state. >> >> So we can compile* catalogs for all top-scope manifests in master branch >> and store those compiled* catalogs in fuel-library repo. Then for each >> proposed patch CI will compare new catalogs with stored ones and print out >> the difference if any. This will pretty much show what is going to be >> changed in system configuration by proposed patch. >> >> We were discussing such checks before several times, iirc, but we did not >> have right tools to implement such thing before. Well, now we do :) I think >> it could be quite useful even in non-voting mode. >> >> * By saying compiled catalogs I don't mean actual/real puppet catalogs, I >> mean sorted lists of all classes/resources with all parameters that we find >> during puppet-rspec tests in our noop test framework, something like >> standard puppet-rspec coverage. See example [0] for networks.pp task [1]. >> >> Regards, >> Alex >> >> [0] http://paste.openstack.org/show/477839/ >> [1] >> https://github.com/openstack/fuel-library/blob/master/deployment/puppet/osnailyfacter/modular/openstack-network/networks.pp > > Thank you, Alex. > Yes, the composition layer is a top-scope manifests, known as a Fuel > library modular tasks [0]. > > The "deployment data checks", is nothing more than comparing the > committed vs changed states of fixtures [1] of puppet catalogs for known > deployment paths under test with rspecs written for each modular task [2]. > > And the *current status* is: > - the script for data layer checks now implemented [3] > - how-to is being documented here [4] > - a fix to make catalogs compilation idempotent submitted [5]
The status update: - the issue [0] is the data regression checks blocker and is only the Noop tests specific. It has been reworked to not use custom facts [1]. New uuid will be still generated each time in the catalog, but the augeas ensures it will be processed in idempotent way. Let's make this change [2] to the upstream puppet-nova as well please. [0] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1517915 [1] https://review.openstack.org/251314 [2] https://review.openstack.org/131710 - pregenerated catalogs for the Noop tests to become the very first committed state in the data regression process has to be put in the *separate repo*. Otherwise, the stackalytics would go mad as that would be a 600k-liner patch to an OpenStack project, which is the Fuel-library now :) So, I'm planning to use the separate repo for the templates. Note, we could as well move the tests/noop/astute.yaml/ there. Thoughts? > - and there is my WIP branch [6] with the initial committed state of > deploy data pre-generated. So, you can checkout, make any test changes > to manifests and run the data check (see the README [4]). It works for > me, there is no issues with idempotent re-checks of a clean committed > state or tests failing when unexpected. > > So the plan is to implement this noop tests extention as a non-voting CI > gate after I make an example workflow update for developers to the > Fuel wiki. Thoughts? > > [0] > https://github.com/openstack/fuel-library/blob/master/deployment/puppet/osnailyfacter/modular > [1] > https://github.com/openstack/fuel-library/tree/master/tests/noop/astute.yaml > [2] https://github.com/openstack/fuel-library/tree/master/tests/noop/spec > [3] https://review.openstack.org/240015 > [4] > https://github.com/openstack/fuel-library/blob/master/tests/noop/README.rst > [5] https://review.openstack.org/247989 > [6] https://github.com/bogdando/fuel-library-1/commits/data_checks > > -- Best regards, Bogdan Dobrelya, Irc #bogdando __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev