Assaf Muller wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 7:02 AM, Rossella Sblendido<rsblend...@suse.com>  wrote:
On 11/20/2015 03:54 AM, Armando M. wrote:

On 19 November 2015 at 18:26, Assaf Muller<amul...@redhat.com
<mailto:amul...@redhat.com>>  wrote:

     On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Armando M.<arma...@gmail.com
     <mailto:arma...@gmail.com>>  wrote:
     >  Hi Neutrites,
     >
     >  We are nearly two weeks away from the end of Mitaka 1.
     >
     >  I am writing this email to invite you to be mindful to what you
review,
     >  especially in the next couple of weeks. Whenever you have the time
to review
     >  code, please consider giving priority to the following:
     >
     >  Patches that target blueprints targeted for Mitaka;
     >  Patches that target bugs that are either critical or high;
     >  Patches that target rfe-approved 'bugs';
     >  Patches that target specs that have followed the most current
submission
     >  process;

     Is it possible to create Gerrit dashboards for patches that answer
these
     criteria, and then persist the links in Neutron's dashboards devref
     page?
     http://docs.openstack.org/developer/neutron/dashboards/index.html
     That'd be super useful.


We should look into that, but to be perfectly honest I am not sure how
easy it would be, since we'd need to cross-reference content that lives
into gerrit as well as launchpad. Would that even be possible?
To cross-reference we can use the bug ID or the blueprint name.

I created a script that queries launchpad to get:
1) Bug number of the bugs tagged with approved-rfe
2) Bug number of the critical/high bugs
3) list of blueprints targeted for the current milestone (mitaka-1)

With this info the script builds a .dash file that can be used by
gerrit-dash-creator [2] to produce a dashboard url .

The script prints also the queries that can be used in gerrit UI directly,
e.g.:
Critical/High Bugs
(topic:bug/1399249 OR topic:bug/1399280 OR topic:bug/1443421 OR
topic:bug/1453350 OR topic:bug/1462154 OR topic:bug/1478100 OR
topic:bug/1490051 OR topic:bug/1491131 OR topic:bug/1498790 OR
topic:bug/1505575 OR topic:bug/1505843 OR topic:bug/1513678 OR
topic:bug/1513765 OR topic:bug/1514810)


This is the dashboard I get right now [3]

I tried in many ways to get Gerrit to filter patches if the commit message
contains a bug ID. Something like:

(message:"#1399249" OR message:"#1399280" OR message:"#1443421" OR
message:"#1453350" OR message:"#1462154" OR message:"#1478100" OR
message:"#1490051" OR message:"#1491131" OR message:"#1498790" OR
message:"#1505575" OR message:"#1505843" OR message:"#1513678" OR
message:"#1513765" OR message:"#1514810")

but it doesn't work well, the result of the filter contains patches that
have nothing to do with the bugs queried.
That's why I had to filter using the topic.

CAVEAT: To make the dashboard work, bug fixes must use the topic "bug/ID"
and patches implementing a blueprint the topic "bp/name". If a patch is not
following this convention it won't be showed in the dashboard, since the
topic is used as filter. Most of us use this convention already anyway so I
hope it's not too much of a burden.

Feedback is appreciated :)

Rossella this is exactly what I wanted :) Let's iterate on the patch
and merge it.
We could then consider running the script automatically on a daily
basis and publishing the resulting URL in a nice bookmarkable place.

Just the thought I had. The dashboard generator is being very helpful to me :), but it's
something that could be automated.


[1] https://review.openstack.org/248645
[2] https://github.com/openstack/gerrit-dash-creator
[3] https://goo.gl/sglSbp

Btw, I was looking at the current blueprint assignments [1] for Mitaka:
there are some blueprints that still need assignee, approver and
drafter; we should close the gap. If there are volunteers, please reach
out to me.

Thanks,
Armando

[1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/mitaka/+assignments


     >
     >  Everything else should come later, no matter how easy or interesting
it is
     >  to review; remember that as a community we have the collective duty
to work
     >  towards a common (set of) target(s), as being planned in
collaboration with
     >  the Neutron Drivers team and the larger core team.
     >
     >  I would invite submitters to ensure that the Launchpad resources
     >  (blueprints, and bug report) capture the most updated view in terms
of
     >  patches etc. Work with your approver to help him/her be focussed
where it
     >  matters most.
     >
     >  Finally, we had plenty of discussions at the design summit, and some
of
     >  those discussions will have to be followed up with actions (aka code
in
     >  OpenStack lingo). Even though, we no longer have deadlines for
feature
     >  submission, I strongly advise you not to leave it last minute. We
can only
     >  handle so much work for any given release, and past experience tells
us that
     >  we can easily hit a breaking point at around the ~30 blueprint mark.
     >
     >  Once we reached it, it's likely we'll have to start pushing back
work for
     >  Mitaka and allow us some slack; things are fluid as we all know, and
the
     >  random gate breakage is always lurking round the corner! :)
     >
     >  Happy hacking,
     >  Armando
     >
      >

__________________________________________________________________________
      >  OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
      >  Unsubscribe:
     openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
     <http://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
      >  http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
      >


__________________________________________________________________________
     OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
     Unsubscribe:
     openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
     <http://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
     http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev




__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to