Tony Breeds wrote: >>> [...] >>> Confusion >>> ========= >>> So this is really quite trivial. As you can see above we don't have an >>> #openstack-meeting-2 channel the ...-alt is clearly that, but still people >>> are >>> confused. How would people feel about creating #openstack-meeting-2 and >>> making >>> it redirect to #openstack-meeting-alt? >> >> I'd rather standardize and rename -alt to -2 (i.e. redirect -alt to -2 >> on IRC, and bulk-change all meetings YAML from -alt to -2). > > I wanted to go the other way as it's slightly less impactful. Most people grok > that '-alt' == '-2'. if we redirect from 2 -> alt it's only a few people > that transparently get redirected. > > If we do it the other way around everyone already in -alt needs to move.
I think it's a one-time cost to solve the confusion over the long run, rather than keep the -alt non-standard construct forever. People have to join new meeting channels regularly, it's not as if you'd "lose" people in the process. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
