Colleagues, I've started working on the change. Here are two patches (fuel-main [1] and fuel-library [2]). They are not ready to review (still does not work and under active development). Changes are not going to be huge. Here is a spec [3]. Will keep the status up to date in this ML thread.
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/248649 [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/248650 [3] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/248814 Vladimir Kozhukalov On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Aleksandr Maretskiy < amarets...@mirantis.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Bogdan Dobrelya <bdobre...@mirantis.com> > wrote: > >> On 23.11.2015 12:47, Aleksandr Maretskiy wrote: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > as you know, Rally runs inside docker on Fuel master node, so docker >> > removal (good improvement) is a problem for Rally users. >> > >> > To solve this, I'm planning to make native Rally installation on Fuel >> > master node that is running on CentOS 7, >> > and then make a step-by-step instruction how to make this installation. >> > >> > So I hope docker removal will not make issues for Rally users. >> >> I believe the most backwards compatible scenario is to keep the docker >> installed while removing the fuel-* docker things back to the host OS. >> So nothing would prevent user from pulling and running whichever docker >> containers he wants to put on the Fuel master node. Makes sense? >> >> > Sounds good > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
