Igor,

it is much more clear for me now. Thank you :)

On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Igor Belikov <ibeli...@mirantis.com> wrote:

> Hi Stanislaw,
>
> The reason behind this is simple - deployment tests are heavy. Each
> deployment test occupies whole server for ~2 hours, for each commit we have
> 2 deployment tests (for current fuel-library master) and that’s just
> because we don’t test CentOS deployment for now.
> If we assume that developers will rertrigger deployment tests only when
> retrigger would actually solve the failure - it’s still not smart in terms
> of HW usage to retrigger both tests when only one has failed, for example.
> And there are cases when retrigger just won’t do it and CI Engineer must
> manually erase the existing environment on slave or fix it by other means,
> so it’s better when CI Engineer looks through logs before each retrigger of
> deployment test.
>
> Hope this answers your question.
>
> --
> Igor Belikov
> Fuel CI Engineer
> ibeli...@mirantis.com
>
> On 20 Nov 2015, at 13:57, Stanislaw Bogatkin <sbogat...@mirantis.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Igor,
>
> would you be so kind tell, why fuel-library deployment tests doesn't
> support this? Maybe there is a link with previous talks about it?
>
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Igor Belikov <ibeli...@mirantis.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I’d like to inform you that all jobs running on Fuel CI (with the
>> exception of fuel-library deployment tests) now support retriggering via
>> “recheck” or “reverify” comments in Gerrit.
>> Exact regex is the same one used in Openstack-Infra’s zuul and can be
>> found here
>> https://github.com/fuel-infra/jenkins-jobs/blob/master/servers/fuel-ci/global.yaml#L3
>>
>> CI-Team kindly asks you to not abuse this option, unfortunately not every
>> failure could be solved by retriggering.
>> And, to stress this out once again: fuel-library deployment tests don’t
>> support this, so you still have to ask for a retrigger in #fuel-infra irc
>> channel.
>>
>> Thanks for attention.
>> --
>> Igor Belikov
>> Fuel CI Engineer
>> ibeli...@mirantis.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> <http://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org/?subject:unsubscribe>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to