Folks I guess it should be pretty simple to roll back - install older version and restore the backup with preservation of /var/log directory.
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 7:38 PM, Sergii Golovatiuk <sgolovat...@mirantis.com > wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 5:50 PM, Matthew Mosesohn <mmoses...@mirantis.com> > wrote: > >> Vladimir, >> >> The old site.pp is long out of date and should just be recreated from the >> content of all the other $service-only.pp files. >> >> My main question is how do we propose to do a rollback from an update (in >> theory, from 8.0 to 9.0, then back to 8.0)? Should we hardcode persistent >> data directories (or symlink them?) to >> /var/lib/fuel/$fuel_version/$service_name, as we are doing behind the >> scenes currently with Docker? If we keep that mechanism in place, all the >> existing puppet modules can be used without any modifications. On the same >> note, upgrade/rollback is the same as backup and restore, that means our >> restore should follow a similar approach. >> -Matthew >> > > There only one idea I have is to do dual partitioning system. The similar > approach is implemented in CoreOS. > > >> >> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 6:36 PM, Bogdan Dobrelya <bdobre...@mirantis.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On 19.11.2015 15:59, Vladimir Kozhukalov wrote: >>> > Dear colleagues, >>> > >>> > As might remember, we introduced Docker containers on the master node a >>> > while ago when we implemented first version of Fuel upgrade feature. >>> The >>> > motivation behind was to make it possible to rollback upgrade process >>> if >>> > something goes wrong. >>> > >>> > Now we are at the point where we can not use our tarball based upgrade >>> > approach any more and those patches that deprecate upgrade tarball has >>> > been already merged. Although it is a matter of a separate discussion, >>> > it seems that upgrade process rather should be based on kind of backup >>> > and restore procedure. We can backup Fuel data on an external media, >>> > then we can install new version of Fuel from scratch and then it is >>> > assumed backed up Fuel data can be applied over this new Fuel instance. >>> >>> A side-by-side upgrade, correct? That should work as well. >>> >>> > The procedure itself is under active development, but it is clear that >>> > rollback in this case would be nothing more than just restoring from >>> the >>> > previously backed up data. >>> > >>> > As for Docker containers, still there are potential advantages of using >>> > them on the Fuel master node, but our current implementation of the >>> > feature seems not mature enough to make us benefit from the >>> > containerization. >>> > >>> > At the same time there are some disadvantages like >>> > >>> > * it is tricky to get logs and other information (for example, rpm >>> > -qa) for a service like shotgun which is run inside one of >>> containers. >>> > * it is specific UX when you first need to run dockerctl shell >>> > {container_name} and then you are able to debug something. >>> > * when building IBP image we mount directory from the host file >>> system >>> > into mcollective container to make image build faster. >>> > * there are config files and some other files which should be shared >>> > among containers which introduces unnecessary complexity to the >>> > whole system. >>> > * our current delivery approach assumes we wrap into rpm/deb packages >>> > every single piece of the Fuel system. Docker images are not an >>> > exception. And as far as they depend on other rpm packages we >>> forced >>> > to build docker-images rpm package using kind of specific build >>> > flow. Besides this package is quite big (300M). >>> > * I'd like it to be possible to install Fuel not from ISO but from >>> RPM >>> > repo on any rpm based distribution. But it is double work to >>> support >>> > both Docker based and package based approach. >>> >>> There is another point, the containers long build time when installing >>> the master node. >>> >>> > >>> > Probably some of you can give other examples. Anyway, the idea is to >>> get >>> > rid of Docker containers on the master node and switch to plane package >>> > based approach that we used before. >>> > >>> > As far as there is nothing new here, we just need to use our old >>> site.pp >>> > (with minimal modifications), it looks like it is possible to implement >>> > this during 8.0 release cycle. If there are no principal objections, >>> > please give me a chance to do this ASAP (during 8.0), I know it is a >>> > huge risk for the release, but still I think I can do this. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Vladimir Kozhukalov >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> __________________________________________________________________________ >>> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >>> > Unsubscribe: >>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >>> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >>> > >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Best regards, >>> Bogdan Dobrelya, >>> Irc #bogdando >>> >>> >>> __________________________________________________________________________ >>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >>> Unsubscribe: >>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >>> >> >> >> __________________________________________________________________________ >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Unsubscribe: >> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> >> > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > -- Yours Faithfully, Vladimir Kuklin, Fuel Library Tech Lead, Mirantis, Inc. +7 (495) 640-49-04 +7 (926) 702-39-68 Skype kuklinvv 35bk3, Vorontsovskaya Str. Moscow, Russia, www.mirantis.com <http://www.mirantis.ru/> www.mirantis.ru vkuk...@mirantis.com
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev