On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Ruby Loo <rlooya...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10 November 2015 at 12:08, Dmitry Tantsur <dtant...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> On 11/10/2015 05:45 PM, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> In the last Ironic meeting [1] we started a discussion about whether >>> we need to have a mid-cycle meeting for the Mitaka cycle or not. Some >>> ideas about the format of the midcycle were presented in that >>> conversation and this email is just a follow up on that conversation. >>> >>> The ideas presented were: >>> >>> 1. Normal mid-cycle >>> >>> Same format as the previous ones, the meetup will happen in a specific >>> venue somewhere in the world. >>> >> >> I would really want to see you all as often as possible. However, I don't >> see much value in proper face-to-face mid-cycles as compared to improving >> our day-to-day online communications. > > > +2. > > My take on mid-cycles is that if folks want to have one, that is fine, I > might not attend :) > > My preference is 4) no mid-cycle -- and try to work more effectively with > people in different locations and time zones. > I was hoping to suggest that we have a mid-cycle co-located with neutron, but they are not having a mid-cycle. So, my preference would be 4) no mid cycle. I would like for us to try a few virtual sprints on targeted subjects. I did one for CI documentation and the hardest part about setting that up was picking the time. https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/VirtualSprints Kurt Taylor (krtaylor)
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
