On Tue, Nov 10 2015, gord chung wrote: Hi Gordon,
> i was doing some googling on the current state of time series databases to see > if there was a worthwhile db to implement as a Gnocchi driver and it seems > we're currently in the same state as before: there are flaws with all open > source time series databases but if you have lots of money, Splunk is > legit[1]. The thing is the Carbonara based backend is starting to work pretty well, so there's less and less attraction towards other solutions anyway. > as i get asked what Gnocchi is/does pretty often, i usually point them to > docs[2]. that said, do we think it's necessary to define and list explicit use > cases for Gnocchi? Gnocchi is 'a resource indexing and metric storage service' > is a nice one-liner but would a comparison of Gnocchi make it easier to > understand[3]. just wondering if there's a way we can make Gnocchi easier to > understand and consumable. Yes, I think there is. We should write typical use cases and example in the documentation so that people may get a grasp of what Gnocchi is and what kind of problem it can or cannot solve. -- Julien Danjou # Free Software hacker # https://julien.danjou.info
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
