On 11/10/2015 10:28 AM, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote:
Hi,
Let's have a quick poll, which would you prefer and why:
1. openstack baremetal provision state --provide UUID
2. openstack baremetal provision --provide UUID
3. openstack baremetal provide UUID
4. openstack baremetal set provision state --provide UUID
5. openstack baremetal set state --provide UUID
6. openstack baremetal action --provide UUID
I know very little about OSC and it's syntax, but what I would do in
this case is to follow the same syntax as the command that changes the
power state of the nodes. Apparently the power state command proposed
[1] follows the syntax:
$ openstack baremetal power --on | --off <UUID>
I would expect provision state to follow the same, perhaps
$ openstack baremetal provision --provide | --active | ... <UUID>
So my vote goes to make both power and provision state syntax
consistent. (Which currently is the option # 2, but none patches are
merged yet)
It's still not 100% consistent, "power" is a noun, "provision" is a
verb. Not sure it matters, though, adding OSC folks so that they can
weigh in.
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/172517/28
Cheers,
Lucas
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
