While I am not core, I would like to say that Rich's leadership in improving our Keystone Puppet module has been immensely valuable. +1 from me.
-Matthew On Oct 31, 2015 5:58 PM, "Emilien Macchi" <[email protected]> wrote: > At the Summit we discussed about scaling-up our team. > We decided to investigate the creation of sub-groups specific to our > modules that would have +2 power. > > I would like to start with puppet-keystone: > https://review.openstack.org/240666 > > And propose Richard Megginson part of this group. > > Rich is leading puppet-keystone work since our Juno cycle. Without his > leadership and skills, I'm not sure we would have Keystone v3 support in > our modules. > He's a good Puppet reviewer and takes care of backward compatibility. He > also has strong knowledge at how Keystone works. He's always willing to > lead our roadmap regarding identity deployment in OpenStack. > > Having him on-board is for us an awesome opportunity to be ahead of other > deployments tools and supports many features in Keystone that real > deployments actually need. > > I would like to propose him part of the new puppet-keystone-core group. > > Thank you Rich for your work, which is very appreciated. > -- > Emilien Macchi > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
