Hi, The policy should be revert, IMHO. cherry-pick doesn't guarantee the consistency, so it will take more time... Also this way gives time to write tests to exclude the regression in future.
-- Best regards, Sergii Golovatiuk, Skype #golserge IRC #holser On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 6:52 PM, Matthew Mosesohn <mmoses...@mirantis.com> wrote: > Hi Fuelers, > > It seems we have a regression on two critical bugs because of switching > Fuel to puppet-openstacklib: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1507685 > > This regressed to patches that were in Fuel Library that addressed two > bugs marked as Critical. > > We should improve the acceptance criteria for moving to upstream modules > to ensure no bugs are regressed that relate to the particular Puppet module > being migrated. > > Secondly, what should our policy be? Revert the switch to upstream module? > Or just work on cherry-picking the appropriate fixes? > > Best Regards, > Matthew Mosesohn > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
