On 19 October 2015 at 10:01, Monty Taylor <mord...@inaugust.com> wrote:
> > Maybe a non-voting job that adds the deadsnakes PPA and installs 2.6 in the > job setup and then runs pbr tests with it. > > I say non-voting because we'd be introducing a direct-internet consuming > test, which increases the risk of failures - but given that the pbr team is > already careful (given the nature of the project) an informational job > should be good enough, no? Once we remove the dvsm jobs I think we'd be independent in terms of pipeline - at that point I think the risk of a failure would be ok since it wouldn't cascade. But yeah, informational would be fine - we can socialise 'treat it as voting' amongst the committers easily enough. -Rob -- Robert Collins <rbtcoll...@hp.com> Distinguished Technologist HP Converged Cloud __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
