> On 01 Oct 2015, at 14:21, Thierry Carrez <thie...@openstack.org> wrote: > > Jeremy Stanley wrote: >> On 2015-10-01 10:54:20 +1000 (+1000), Richard Jones wrote: >> [...] >>> I believe that if we are moving to semver, then 12.0.0 is >>> appropriate. >> >> Each project participating in the release is following semver >> independently, with the first digit indicating the number of >> OpenStack integrated releases in which that project has >> participated. This means the version numbers will vary between >> projects. For Horizon it's 8.0.0 but for, say, Nova it's 12.0.0 and >> Sahara's 3.0.0. This was chosen specifically to avoid future >> assumptions that the version numbers will remain in sync as they >> will naturally diverge in coming cycles anyway. > > Also Horizon Liberty RC2 was tagged 8.0.0.0rc1 (and liberty-2 8.0.0.0b2, > and liberty-3 8.0.0.0b3), so it shouldn't come as a complete surprise. > >> For further details, see the thread starting around >> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-June/067006.html >> which lists all of them (noting there have since been some >> corrections to that initial plan). > > Also: > http://ttx.re/new-versioning.html > > And we finally publish the series / versions map at: > http://docs.openstack.org/releases/
Awesome stuff! Why don’t we see major server projects there, like nova or neutron? Ihar
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
