Sorry, didn’t mean that to come down as a triple pile-on, with me doing it twice. My bad, I’m sorry.
Thanks, doug > On Sep 15, 2015, at 6:11 PM, Mathieu Gagné <mga...@internap.com> wrote: > > On 2015-09-15 8:06 PM, Doug Wiegley wrote: >> >> “Neutron doesn’t get it and never will.” >> >> I’m not sure how all ‘yes’ above keeps translating to this old saw, but >> is there any tiny chance we can stop living in the past and instead >> focus on the use cases that we want to solve? >> > > I apologized for my unfair statement where I very wrongly associated a > person's opinion to a whole project. I would like to move on. Thanks > > -- > Mathieu > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
