On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Andrey Pavlov <andrey...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello, > > We have rally job with fake virt driver. And we run it periodically. > This job runs 200 servers and measures 'show' operations. > > On 18.08 it was run well[1]. But on 21.08 it was failed by timeout[2]. > I tried to understand what happens. > I tried to check this job with 20 servers only[3]. It passed but I see > that > operations with neutron take more time now (list subnets, list network > interfaces). > and as result start and show instances take more time also. > > Maybe anyone knows what happens? > Looking at the merged Neutron patches between the 18th and 21st, there's a lot of candidates, including QoS and work around quotas. I think the best way to find out would be to run a profiler against Neutron from the 18th, and Neutron from the 21st while running the Rally tests, and finding out if the major bottlenecks moved. Last time I profiled Neutron I used GeventProfiler: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/GreenletProfiler Ironically I was having issued with the profiler that comes with Eventlet. > > > [1] > http://logs.openstack.org/13/211613/6/experimental/ec2-api-rally-dsvm-fakevirt/fac263e/ > [2] > http://logs.openstack.org/74/213074/7/experimental/ec2-api-rally-dsvm-fakevirt/91d0675/ > [3] > http://logs.openstack.org/46/219846/1/experimental/ec2-api-rally-dsvm-fakevirt/dad98f0/ > > -- > Kind regards, > Andrey Pavlov. > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev