Hi all, We're contemplating a small syntax change in the Congress policy language and wanted to see if it would cause anyone problems.
Currently you can write rules that give a single table differing numbers of columns. In the following example, the 'error' table has both 1 column and 2 columns. error(vm) :- blah blah error(vm, net) :- blah blah We're contemplating removing this flexibility and making every table have a fixed number of columns. (We only support differing numbers of columns in very special cases anyway.) Would this cause any problems? Murano team? Thanks, Tim
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
