On 08/14/2015 02:52 AM, Chris Dent wrote: > On Fri, 14 Aug 2015, Clint Byrum wrote: > >> The same is true for these bugs. Yes they're real, yes more orgs should >> devote developers to fixing them. > > This may be the root of my concern and something that we're going to > have to address sooner than later. > >> Your concerns are valid and appreciated. However, I think the side >> effect of not setting it is wasting developer time on a large scale. The >> side effect of setting it is putting that work into a queue which an >> appropriately sized subset of developers can manage. > > Makes sense, for the most part. Thanks to you and Robert for taking > the thread through its paces and getting the thinking out in the > open.
So... I'm at Linux Con this week, meaning that things will be slow. I think - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/208582/ (slightly updated this morning) will get devstack users working again. And I agree, we really need devstack and the gate to be convergent on their solution here, not divergent. -Sean -- Sean Dague http://dague.net
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
