On 14:48 Aug 13, Flavio Percoco wrote: > > This is one of the reasons why it was asked for this email to be sent > rather than making decisions based on assumptions (you're free to read > - or not - the meeting logs). > > Saying "Glance is just pissing off the community" helps spreading a > rumor that has been floating around which causes more harm than good > and I'm not willing to accept that. > > If people have problems with were Glance is headed then please, speak > up. I've done that for Glance, Zaqar, Trove and several other > projects. I expect the same courtesy from other folks in this > community, especially folks in leadership positions.
I got zero responses on the mailing list raising a problem with Glance v2 [1]. I got zero responses on cross project meeting raising a problem with Glance v2 [2]. I'm very happy with my choice of words, because I think this hand slap on Glance is the first time I got acknowledgement in my frustration with Glance. I should not have to attend a Glance meeting to get someone to fix Glance v2 integration issues in Cinder. Glance is trying to increase v2 integration with Nova besides show [3], but I would recommend Nova to not accept further v2 integration until Glance has figured out how to handle issues in projects that already have v2 integration. To start, Glance should assign a cross project liaison [4] to actually respond to integration issues in Cinder. Having focuses on the following is not helping: * Artifacts (I honestly don't know what this is and failed to find an explanation that's *not* some API doc). * Tagging * Role based properties [5] (who is asking for this, and why is Glance enforcing roles?) This is a mess, and complete lack of focus on being what Glance was once good at, a registry for images. [1] - http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-July/070714.html [2] - http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/crossproject/2015/crossproject.2015-07-28-21.03.log.html#l-239 [3] - https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/image/glance.py#L305 [4] - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/CrossProjectLiaisons#Inter-project_Liaisons [5] - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/211201/1 -- Mike Perez __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
