> > Well, SUSE and Redhat (7) use Pacemaker by default, Debian/Ubuntu have it > > (along with others)... > > > > That gives it quite some market share, wouldn't you think? > > > > Yes, I guess the "most popular" meaning is a good match here. > > I see, so in the same way that "nano is *the* Linux text editor" > (Debian/Ubuntu configure it as the default, SUSE and Redhat have it > packaged). Along with quite a few alternatives.
How many cluster stack alternatives can you see in SUSE? How many cluster stack alternatives are available in _every_ major distribution? > Popularity alone doesn't seem like a great criterion for > making these sorts of technology choices. Popularity _alone_ is not the sole criteria, right. But to write something new just because of "NIH" is the wrong approach, IMO. [[ I'm going to stop arguing now. ]] __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev