On 7/30/15, 4:26 PM, "Doug Hellmann" <d...@doughellmann.com> wrote:
>Excerpts from Steven Dake (stdake)'s message of 2015-07-30 15:27:15 +0000: >> >> On 7/29/15, 1:23 PM, "Doug Hellmann" <d...@doughellmann.com> wrote: >> >> >Excerpts from Steven Dake (stdake)'s message of 2015-07-29 20:07:26 >>+0000: >> >> Doug Hellman of the TC suggested we change the mission statement of >> >>Kolla to be a little less specific. The new mission statement I >> >>submitted in the review is here Is basically cutting off the last part >> >>of the mission statement sentence: >> >> >> >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/206789/ >> >> >> >> If your a Kolla core eviewer, please vote 1 (indicating you are a >>core >> >>reviewer in the review) if you dislike this change and think we should >> >>strive to keep our mission unchanged. If you don¹t really have a >>strong >> >>preference, please abstain from voting as to not add non-useful >> >>information to the review. Our core team knows what our true mission >>is >> >>and I don¹t think Doug¹s wording changes the mission significantly. >> > >> >My intent is not to change it at all, but to remove the "marketing >> >fluff", to be consistent with the nature of the missions described >> >by most of the other projects. By all means, hold to those other >> >ideals and goals, but in the project list we want the mission to >> >say what you're doing as clearly and concisely as possible. >> > >> >Doug >> >> Doug, >> >> Its all good, I think the change you suggested simplifies the statement >> without changing the intent. We can still do all those other things as >> you just indicated if we choose to. >> >> I still want to give the core reviewer team an opportunity to vote on >>the >> change which is why I set the short deadline of Aug 3rd to vote -1 (and >> act as a veto vote) which would trigger irc meetings to rework the >>mission >> statement. > >Sure, having the team vote & comment is absolutely appropriate, I >just wanted to clarify the reasons for the change. :-) Doug, I communicated with all but one of our core reviewers (Martin Andre) who is moving countries ATM and the core reviewer team are +1 on the mission statement change. I’m not sure when Martin gets settled, and I don’t want to block. Knowing Martin, he wouldn’t have a strong opinion on the matter. Regards -steve > >> Thanks for the good feedback, I actually think the modified mission >> statement is faster to say which is always a good thing :) > >++ > >Doug > >> >> Regards >> -steve >> >> > >> >> >> >> I¹ll keep the schedule open until August 3rd and ask the TC to hold >>off >> >>on approving the submitted mission until the core team has not weighed >> >>in with a 1 vote. A vote of 1 will count as a veto from the core >> >>reviewer team, and we will have to have some kind of >>super-brainstorming >> >>session like we did before to simplify the Kolla mission statement to >> >>something the TC would accept. >> >> >> >> Regards >> >> -steve >> > >> >>>________________________________________________________________________ >>>__ >> >OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> >Unsubscribe: >>openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >> >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> > >__________________________________________________________________________ >OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
