Do we have any success here.. ? On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 8:32 AM Alex Schultz <aschu...@mirantis.com> wrote:
> Vladimir, > > Thanks. Can you point me to the error for perestroika? I'd be happy to > take a look as well. I spent most of Friday throwing various options at the > CI system to try and figure out how to get the spec to work with the CI > fuel-library package building so perhaps there's a different way to handle > this in the spec. > > -Alex > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Vladimir Kozhukalov < > vkozhuka...@mirantis.com> wrote: > >> Alex, >> >> As I've just found out this package available here [1] is not actually >> build with your patch (instead it is from previous successful build). Looks >> like "perestroika" can not build this package due to some environment >> related issues. I've poked Dmitry Burmistrov to check it out. >> However, your patch is OK, make system can build this package and ISO >> passes BVT tests. >> >> >> [1] >> http://172.18.160.74/osci/review/CR-202763/mos/7.0/fuel/base/centos6/Packages/fuel-library7.0-7.0.0-1.mos6888.git.bac86fe.noarch.rpm >> >> Vladimir Kozhukalov >> >> On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Vladimir Kozhukalov < >> vkozhuka...@mirantis.com> wrote: >> >>> Alex, >>> >>> Yes, spec is much better place to introduce this. BTW, "perestroika" >>> builds new package for every commit and patch set and publishes them via >>> HTTP. Please check here >>> http://172.18.160.74/osci/review/CR-202763/mos/7.0/fuel/base/centos6/Packages/fuel-library7.0-7.0.0-1.mos6888.git.bac86fe.noarch.rpm >>> if the package contains all necessary upstream modules. >>> >>> Vladimir Kozhukalov >>> >>> On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 3:28 AM, Alex Schultz <aschu...@mirantis.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Not until we start using it then any ci that tests with that module >>>> will validate the modules inclusion. You can check the output of the jobs >>>> as we are printing what modules are managed by librarian. >>>> >>>> -Alex >>>> On Jul 17, 2015 6:17 PM, "Andrew Woodward" <xar...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Fantastic, do we have some way to validate that the module was pulled >>>>> in properly as part of fuel-library CI? >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 2:48 PM Alex Schultz <aschu...@mirantis.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hey All, >>>>>> >>>>>> I've figured it out without having to modify the fuel-main build >>>>>> code. I've updated the fuel-library spec with a build action that invokes >>>>>> the script to pull down external modules. Please take some time to >>>>>> review >>>>>> the two reviews out there for this change to see if there are any issues >>>>>> with the way it is implemented. >>>>>> >>>>>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/202763/ >>>>>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/202767/ >>>>>> >>>>>> This is a first step towards being able to pull in unmodified >>>>>> external puppet modules. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> -Alex >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Andrew Woodward < >>>>>> awoodw...@mirantis.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 12:24 PM Vladimir Kozhukalov < >>>>>>> vkozhuka...@mirantis.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Alex, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Great that you did this. Now I think I can prepare fuel-main patch >>>>>>>> to invoke this script right before building fuel-library package. I'll >>>>>>>> add >>>>>>>> you to review it. Is it ok if I do this monday morning? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Keep in minde we agreeded to a deadline to get this sorted and in >>>>>>> shape to land by EOD monday or we will have to retain the old, and >>>>>>> crappy >>>>>>> fork method. If possible please work out how this needs to work as >>>>>>> early as >>>>>>> possible so Alex can continue. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Vladimir Kozhukalov >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 5:51 PM, Alex Schultz < >>>>>>>> aschu...@mirantis.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hey Vladimir, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 7:33 AM, Vladimir Kozhukalov < >>>>>>>>> vkozhuka...@mirantis.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Alex, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Gathering upstream modules certainly should be implemented as a >>>>>>>>>> separate script so as to make it possible to use it wherever we need >>>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>> (tests, builds, etc.) According to builds there are two things >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 1) We have so called "perestroika" package build system (Dmitry >>>>>>>>>> Burmistrov is a main contributor here). By the end of next week we >>>>>>>>>> are >>>>>>>>>> going to switch building all the packages to "perestroika". And in >>>>>>>>>> order to >>>>>>>>>> gather upstream modules right before building fuel-library package, >>>>>>>>>> we need >>>>>>>>>> to change perestroika build scripts. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 2) Currently we build packages using make system and you are >>>>>>>>>> right about the place where you need to make changes. >>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/stackforge/fuel-main/blob/master/packages/module.mk#L63-L82 >>>>>>>>>> If you create shell script, I'll help you to add it to make code. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I have updated my review[0] to extract the update logic to it's >>>>>>>>> own bash script that can be invoked by the build scripts. Let me >>>>>>>>> know what >>>>>>>>> would be the best way to wedge this in there. I think for the >>>>>>>>> "perestroika" this would also be needed for the fuel-library build, >>>>>>>>> so if >>>>>>>>> you point me at that I can see if I can help make that change as well. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>> -Alex >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/202763/ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Vladimir Kozhukalov >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Aleksandr Didenko < >>>>>>>>>> adide...@mirantis.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I believe build_repo function is the best way to do this [0]. So >>>>>>>>>>> for fuel-library we'll need to run a shell script right from the >>>>>>>>>>> repo >>>>>>>>>>> before 'touch $$@'. We can make it either conditional ( test -f >>>>>>>>>>> ./path/additional_build_script.sh && bash >>>>>>>>>>> ./path/additional_build_script.sh >>>>>>>>>>> ) or as additional parameter to function and add it in fuel-library >>>>>>>>>>> call [1] >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>> Alex >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> [0] >>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/stackforge/fuel-main/blob/master/repos.mk#L16-L37 >>>>>>>>>>> [1] >>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/stackforge/fuel-main/blob/master/repos.mk#L45 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Alex Schultz < >>>>>>>>>>> aschu...@mirantis.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hey Alex, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 17, 2015 4:32 AM, "Aleksandr Didenko" < >>>>>>>>>>>> adide...@mirantis.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > I think that we should provide a separate script that will >>>>>>>>>>>> fetch the upstream modules into fuel-library/deployment/puppet/ >>>>>>>>>>>> directory. >>>>>>>>>>>> It will allow us to have everything in a single place and use this >>>>>>>>>>>> script >>>>>>>>>>>> in ISO build process and CI jobs. >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Right. That is what I'm going for. The issue I need help with >>>>>>>>>>>> is the best way to execute this as part of the build process. >>>>>>>>>>>> From what i >>>>>>>>>>>> understand of the build process is that we are using git archive >>>>>>>>>>>> for all >>>>>>>>>>>> pieces so I'm not sure how to wedge in an extra script execution >>>>>>>>>>>> to do the >>>>>>>>>>>> module fetch. The creation of the script isn't the issue, the >>>>>>>>>>>> issue is how >>>>>>>>>>>> can I properly run it as part of the build process. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> > Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>> > Alex >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>> -Alex >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> > On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 11:17 PM, Alex Schultz < >>>>>>>>>>>> aschu...@mirantis.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> Hello everyone, >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> I have committed the initial configuration required to start >>>>>>>>>>>> leveraging librarian-puppet as part of the way we pull in upstream >>>>>>>>>>>> puppet >>>>>>>>>>>> modules[0]. Additionally, I have also committed a change that >>>>>>>>>>>> would pull in >>>>>>>>>>>> the openstack-ironic module[1]. The one piece that is missing >>>>>>>>>>>> from this >>>>>>>>>>>> being a complete solution is the ability to run librarian-puppet >>>>>>>>>>>> as part of >>>>>>>>>>>> our build process for the fuel-library. I've looked into the >>>>>>>>>>>> fuel-main >>>>>>>>>>>> build scripts and I think it's over my head to figure this out >>>>>>>>>>>> just by >>>>>>>>>>>> looking. Can anyone explain to me or assist me in how I could go >>>>>>>>>>>> about >>>>>>>>>>>> modifying the existing build system to be able to run >>>>>>>>>>>> librarian-puppet to >>>>>>>>>>>> prepare the source for the package? In my initial investigation, >>>>>>>>>>>> it looks >>>>>>>>>>>> like it would be a modification of the fuel-main/packages/ >>>>>>>>>>>> module.mk[3] file. I basically need to do the >>>>>>>>>>>> prepare_library[3] function from the 202763 review[0] after we've >>>>>>>>>>>> pulled >>>>>>>>>>>> all the sources together to fetch the upstream modules. >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>> >> -Alex >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> [0] https://review.openstack.org/202763 >>>>>>>>>>>> >> [1] https://review.openstack.org/202767 >>>>>>>>>>>> >> [2] >>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/stackforge/fuel-main/blob/master/packages/module.mk#L63-L82 >>>>>>>>>>>> >> [3] >>>>>>>>>>>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/202763/1/utils/jenkins/fuel_noop_tests.rb >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> __________________________________________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>> >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >>>>>>>>>>>> >> Unsubscribe: >>>>>>>>>>>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> __________________________________________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >>>>>>>>>>>> > Unsubscribe: >>>>>>>>>>>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> __________________________________________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >>>>>>>>>>>> Unsubscribe: >>>>>>>>>>>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> __________________________________________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >>>>>>>>>>> Unsubscribe: >>>>>>>>>>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> __________________________________________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >>>>>>>>>> Unsubscribe: >>>>>>>>>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >>>>>>>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> __________________________________________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >>>>>>>>> Unsubscribe: >>>>>>>>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >>>>>>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> __________________________________________________________________________ >>>>>>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >>>>>>>> Unsubscribe: >>>>>>>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >>>>>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Andrew Woodward >>>>>>> Mirantis >>>>>>> Fuel Community Ambassador >>>>>>> Ceph Community >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> __________________________________________________________________________ >>>>>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >>>>>>> Unsubscribe: >>>>>>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >>>>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> __________________________________________________________________________ >>>>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >>>>>> Unsubscribe: >>>>>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >>>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> Andrew Woodward >>>>> >>>>> Mirantis >>>>> >>>>> Fuel Community Ambassador >>>>> >>>>> Ceph Community >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> __________________________________________________________________________ >>>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >>>>> Unsubscribe: >>>>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> __________________________________________________________________________ >>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >>>> Unsubscribe: >>>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> __________________________________________________________________________ >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Unsubscribe: >> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> >> > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -- Mike Scherbakov #mihgen
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev