On 7/20/15, 05:16, "Jesse Pretorius" <jesse.pretor...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 17 July 2015 at 16:14, Kevin Carter <kevin.car...@rackspace.com> wrote: > > >I would like to nominate Matt Kassawara (IRC: sam-i-am) to the OpenStack >Ansible deployment core team. Matt has been instrumental in building out >our current install and use documentation[0], he is just about always in >the community channel(s) helping folks, > is a great technical resource for all things networking / OpenStack, and >is one of the main people we already rely on to ensure we're documenting >the right things in the right places. IMHO, its about time he be given >Core powers within the OSAD project. > >Please respond with +1/-1s and or any other concerns. > >As a reminder, we are using the voting process outlined at [ >https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/Approved/CoreDevProcess ><https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/Approved/CoreDevProcess> ] to >add members to our core team. > > > > >At this stage my vote is -1. While Matt definitely provides valuable >input and assistance from time to time, he is not an consistently active >reviewer. By comparison there are several others [1] who are more >actively reviewing and providing good feedback > with regards to code quality, testing results and project fit. > > >I would like to see Matt do more reviews and challenge the team to be >better at documenting and usability before considering him as a core team >member. > > >[1] >http://stackalytics.com/?project_type=stackforge&release=liberty&module=os >-ansible-deployment Yes, Matt should be doing more reviews. The difference is that (as I understand it) we want to include Matt as a documentation core more than as a core reviewer for playbooks. Matt's reviews have all pertained to documentation. Other projects (e.g., Neutron and maybe Glance) are trying out a trust system where cores are accepted for subsystem expertise. Those cores are expected to only +2 and/or approve changes for their subsystem. I don't think anyone can question Matt's expertise in documentation, or Matt's knowledge of the architecture of the project. Tl;dr What if we trust Matt to only approve documentation related changes? Cheers, Ian __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
