+1 for enabling auto-abandon Sergii, I think the period should be smaller, 2 weeks - 1 month, if patch is important, the author will unabandon it.
Thanks, On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 3:50 AM, Sergii Golovatiuk <sgolovat...@mirantis.com> wrote: > 3 Months should be a good period. Sometimes, people have one month > vacation thus it might be a problem in such cases. > > -- > Best regards, > Sergii Golovatiuk, > Skype #golserge > IRC #holser > > On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Mike Scherbakov <mscherba...@mirantis.com> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> we have too many patches which hang for over a month without attention. >> Almost all are those which should be abandoned due to changes happened in >> master, and need complete rework. Or, those were just proposals to make >> something, which didn't fly. Unfortunately there are those which were good >> ideas, but didn't attract enough attention from cores and didn't land into >> master as a result. >> >> Anyway, I think we need to keep our review queues in better health. Can >> we enable auto-abandon back again, if patch is hanging out for a month or >> more? >> -- >> Mike Scherbakov >> #mihgen >> >> __________________________________________________________________________ >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Unsubscribe: >> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> >> > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
