it seems two kinds of sub projects. one is vendor plugins, for which option #1 seems appropriate. another is things like l2gw and octavia, for which option #2 might make more sense.
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 12:23 AM, Kyle Mestery <mest...@mestery.com> wrote: > After some consultation with Doug and Thierry, we've boiled the change I'm > recommending below down to two options: > > 1. independent, ad-hoc backport branches, tag yourself > 2. cycle-with-intermediary, stable branches, tag by RelMgt team > > I think what we really want is option #1 for these projects. I'd like all of > them to be the same here, so if people are thinking differently, please > reply on this thread. I'll update the patches to reflect the fact we'll be > in charge of the ad-hoc branches and tags in the Neutron Stadium. > > Thanks! > Kyle > > > On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Kyle Mestery <mest...@mestery.com> wrote: >> >> The tl;dr for this email is that the patch referenced here [1] is moving >> release management tasks for the networking-foo projects into alignment with >> other Neutron libraries. There is value in having this consolidated into a >> single place. >> >> The longer version is that as plugin backends and new libraries have >> integrated into the Neutron Stadium, it makes sense to align some release >> items here. For example, merge commits, tags, and stable branch management >> aspects are things which are best done by a central team for all >> networking-foo projects (along with existing projects). In particular, >> stable releases have some specific requirements [2] which need to be met as >> stable releases are done here. Ensuring this is following existing processes >> is part of the reason for this gerrit ACL change. >> >> Please comment on the reviews if you have concerns as a networking-foo >> owner. >> >> Thanks! >> Kyle >> >> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/198749/ >> [2] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/StableBranch > > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev