Thanks Sean, comments inline. On 6 July 2015 at 16:58, Sean M. Collins <s...@coreitpro.com> wrote:
> I'd also like to chime in - we've had some discussions on -infra today > about the partial upgrade issue, and collected the following notes on an > etherpad. > > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/neutron-partial-upgrades > > One of the things identified, was the complexity of the DVR feature in > Neutron, and an attempt to simplify the partial upgrade job by not > enabling the DVR feature. > The DVR issue is entirely orthogonal to this, but I am willing to play along. > > > http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking/2015/networking.2015-07-06-21.00.log.html > > Clark Boylan has proposed a patch to create a new job that runs on > multiple nodes, but does not have DVR enabled, in the hopes that having > less moving parts will allow the multinode grenade work to continue on a > parallel track, Who is leading the Grenade effort? Is it Clark? > with bugfixes or additional work on the Neutron DVR > feature not blocking the overall effort. The idea would be eventually to > enable DVR, once we have taken care of all the other work that needs to > be done. > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/198906/ I thought that's what Joe did in [1]. Am I barking up at the wrong tree? > > > What is everyone's thoughts? > [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/195259/ > > -- > Sean M. Collins > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
