Excerpts from James Slagle's message of 2015-06-30 15:30:49 +0000: > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 8:44 AM, Gregory Haynes <g...@greghaynes.net> wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > DIB has come a long way and we seem to have a fairly stable interface > > for the elements and the image creation scripts. As such, I think it's > > about time we commit to a major version release. Hopefully this can give > > our users the (correct) impression that DIB is ready for use by folks > > who want some level of interface stability. > > > > AFAICT our bug list does not have any major issues that might require us > > to break our interface, so I dont see any harm in 'just going for it'. > > If anyone has input on fixes/features we should consider including > > before a 1.0.0 release please speak up now. If there are no objections > > by next week I'd like to try and cut a release then. :) > > Sounds good to me. I think the stable interfaces also includes the > elements expected environment variables. It probably makes sense to > document somewhere what the stable interfaces are, so that people > doing releases know how to version the release appropriately based on > any changes to those interfaces. > > Should we also remove the deprecated disk-image-get-kernel prior to > the 1.0.0? There's a few other deprecations as well (map-packages), > but I don't think we ever fully moved off of that in dib itself. >
Both are great ideas. I've created [1] and [2] for this. 1: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/198810/ 2: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/198814/ __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
