Is Swift the only project that uses the ceilometermiddleware - or just the only project that uses ceilometermiddleware that doesn't already have a oslo.config instance handy?
FWIW There's a WIP patch that's trying to bring a *bit* of oslo.config love to the keystone middleware for policy.json [1]. Not sure if a similar approach could solve the broker/url/parsing issue described in that other thread. If swift is the only project that uses ceilometermiddleware currently it seems to make sense move the installation to lib/swift in devstack? -Clay 1. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/149930/ On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 5:06 AM, Chris Dent <chd...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Sat, 27 Jun 2015, Chris Dent wrote: > > * What code should be calling and hosting install_ceilometermiddleware? >> >> Since it is lib/swift that is using it, there makes some sense? >> Especially since it already has a relatively long block of >> configuration instruction. >> > > I've put up a devstack review for this change: > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/196378/ > > > -- > Chris Dent tw:@anticdent freenode:cdent > https://tank.peermore.com/tanks/cdent > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
