> -----Original Message----- > From: Jeremy Stanley [mailto:fu...@yuggoth.org] > Sent: 26 June 2015 16:42 > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] The unbearable lightness of specs > > On 2015-06-25 16:39:56 +0000 (+0000), Tim Bell wrote: > [...] > > One of the problems that I’ve seen is with specs etiquette where > > people -1 because they have a question. This is a question of > > education rather than a fundamental issue with the process. > > http://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/developers.html#peer-review > has been updated with a 7th entry addressing this in particular. > Hopefully that will help realign reviewers on acceptable vs. > unacceptable use of -1 for certain types of questions over time.
I also feel that stackalytics should credit people of a 0 review comment on specs. Currently, I think that only non-zero reviews are considered as a contribution. My understanding of the workflow is that a 0 is in many cases is the constructive way to respond and therefore should be considered as a contribution. Tim > -- > Jeremy Stanley > > __________________________________________________________ > ________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev- > requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
