my initial proposal for scripted expand/contract migrations is up:

https://review.openstack.org/#/c/192937/




On 6/18/15 5:54 AM, Anna Kamyshnikova wrote:

On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 8:23 PM, Mike Bayer <mba...@redhat.com <mailto:mba...@redhat.com>> wrote:



    On 6/17/15 12:40 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA256

    On 06/17/2015 11:27 AM, Anna Kamyshnikova wrote:
    Ihar, thanks for bringing this up!

    This is very interesting and I think it worth trying. I'm +1 on
    that and want to participate in this work.

    Awesome.

    In fact a lot *not strict* migrations are removed with
    juno_initial, so I hope it won't be so hard for now to apply
    stricter rules for migration. But what is the plan for those
    migrations that are *not strict* now?
    Still, we have several live data migrations from Juno to Kilo:

    - - 14be42f3d0a5_default_sec_group_table.py: populates db with default
    security groups;

    - - 16cdf118d31d_extra_dhcp_options_ipv6_support.py: populates
    extraqdhcpopts with default ip_version = 4;

    - - 2d2a8a565438_hierarchical_binding.py: populates db with
    port_binding_levels objects, then drops old tables;

    - - 35a0f3365720_add_port_security_in_ml2.py: port security field is
    populated with True for ports and networks;

    - - 034883111f_remove_subnetpool_allow_overlap.py: drops allow_overlap
    column from subnetpools: probably unused so we can be ok with it?..

    In any case, the plan for existing migration rules is: don't touch
    them. Their presence in N release just indicates that we cannot get
    online db migration in N+1. That's why we should adopt strict rules
    the earlier the better, so that opportunity does not slip to N+X where
    X is too far.

    The patches currently in review that look suspicious in this regard are:
    - - I4ff7db0f5fa12b0fd1c6b10318e9177fde0210d7: moves data from one table
    into another;
    - - Iecb3e168a805fc5f3d59d894c3f0d9298505e872: fills new columns with
    default server values (why is it even needed?..);
    - - Icde55742aa78ed995bac0896c01c80c9d28aa0cf: alter_column(). Not sure
    we are ok with it;
    - - I66b3ee8c2f9fa6f04b9e89dc49d1a3d277d63191: probably not an issue
    though since it touches existing live data impact rule?

    I made a list of migrations from juno-> kilo that are non
    expansive or do data migrations:

    *these contain "drop column":*

    034883111f_remove_subnetpool_allow_overlap.py
    2d2a8a565438_hierarchical_binding.py

    *these contain "drop table":*

    28c0ffb8ebbd_remove_mlnx_plugin.py
    2b801560a332_remove_hypervneutronplugin_tables.py
    408cfbf6923c_remove_ryu_plugin.py
    57086602ca0a_scrap_nsx_adv_svcs_models.py

    *these contain data migrations:*

    14be42f3d0a5_default_sec_group_table.py
    16cdf118d31d_extra_dhcp_options_ipv6_support.py
    2b801560a332_remove_hypervneutronplugin_tables.py
    2d2a8a565438_hierarchical_binding.py
    35a0f3365720_add_port_security_in_ml2.py

    *Example of failure:*

    
neutron/db/migration/alembic_migrations/versions/2d2a8a565438_hierarchical_binding.py
    - drops the following columns:

    op.drop_constraint(fk_name_dvr[0], 'ml2_dvr_port_bindings',
    'foreignkey')
    op.drop_column('ml2_dvr_port_bindings', 'cap_port_filter')
    op.drop_column('ml2_dvr_port_bindings', 'segment')
    op.drop_column('ml2_dvr_port_bindings', 'driver')

    op.drop_constraint(fk_name[0], 'ml2_port_bindings', 'foreignkey')
    op.drop_column('ml2_port_bindings', 'driver')
    op.drop_column('ml2_port_bindings', 'segment')
        which then causes a failure in Juno:
        OperationalError: (OperationalError) (1054, "Unknown column
    'ml2_port_bindings_1.driver' in 'field list'")

In M release we will be able to create kilo_initial migration that will hide all these migrations(juno -> kilo), so I as there is nothing we can do we won't touch them as Ihar said. The problem about migrations that are on review is more serious, as we should adopt strict rules as early as possible and all core reviewer should be aware about that.

To Ihar's list of migrations on review  I can add :
I3426b13eede8bfa29729cf3efea3419fb91175c4 - insert some data,
I9cf36e1fd3a009c175e0d475af407a30f4e5c408 (almost ready to be merged!) - drop tables. And there are a lot changes with altering columns. One is merged in neutron-vpnaas.
So we should decide these things quickly.





    (the list can be incomplete)
    I think that we should try to use Alembic as much we could as
    Mike is going to support us in that and we have time to make
    some change in Alembic directly.
    Yes, sure, I'm looking forward to see Mike's proposal in public.
    We should undoubtedly plan this work for M release because there
    will be some issues that will appear in the process.
    Sure. Ihar -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2
    iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVgaL4AAoJEC5aWaUY1u57oZgH/34pgV7AqOiq4XnWOOmQ9HA9
    jL+8E9jv8pUSW3X4v0Rm5mDuWJyWscrgy61Om+sWsmqBFAmm/gmLWm+NNADbYM5e
    6hsoaO5WmuvRc03MwIwsa0NEgfPc8EhT5JiZmYRjOBc85ZCs6+UOKUHBAI2EVTg8
    t8YKdTdzxlrZQEOng1lbsUQYkHnNUZTbsREnpangfaHXBk3xmilH/ebGsz3CRUCe
    OBrpp6q8N7mgZgK/UQKb04eS5bCna7eVmv6q7PvIO0SlYhhDbrL3+dv/SZpqQWZ/
    Hek2Oig0IYyPygVrGc4BpT9MIaKisGoxXMn1rRB2g8us8jM58VyzqgXwEH2H4Aw=
    =TqHb -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
    __________________________________________________________________________
    OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
    Unsubscribe:
    openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
    <mailto:openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
    http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


    __________________________________________________________________________
    OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
    Unsubscribe:
    openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
    <http://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
    http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev




--
Regards,
Ann Kamyshnikova
Mirantis, Inc


__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to