On 06/16/2015 06:41 PM, Allison Randal wrote: > On 06/15/2015 01:43 PM, Paul Belanger wrote: >> While I agree those points are valid, and going to be helpful, moving >> under OpenStack (even Stackforge) does also offer the chance to get more >> test integration upstream (not saying this was the original scope). >> However, this could also be achieved by 3rd party integration too. > > Nod, 3rd party integration is worth exploring. > >> I'm still driving forward with some -infra specific packaging for Debian >> / Fedora ATM (zuul packaging). Mostly because of -infra needs for >> packages. Not saying that is a reason to reconsider, but there is the >> need for -infra to consume packages from upstream. > > I suspect that, at least initially, the needs of -infra specific > packaging will be quite different than the needs of general-purpose > packaging in Debian/Fedora distros. Trying to tightly couple the two > will just bog you down in trying to solve far too many problems for far > too many people. But, I also suspect that -infra packaging will be quite > minimal and intended for the services to be configured by puppet, so > there's a very good chance that if you sprint ahead and just do it, your > style of packaging will end up feeding back into future packaging in the > distros. > > Allison
As I wrote, I intend to contribute to that, and get the resulting packages uploaded to Debian. Currently, there's a few issues about missing dependencies in Debian, which I'm trying to fix first (I don't maintain these packages, and as we have strong package ownership in Debian, I have to get in touch with the maintainer first... and that can take some time!). Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
