Agree with Thierry, IMO it sounds more consistent On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Thierry Carrez <thie...@openstack.org> wrote:
> Doug Hellmann wrote: > > [...] > > I put together a little script [1] to try to count the previous > > releases for projects, to use that as the basis for their first > > SemVer-based version number. I pasted the output into an etherpad > > [2] and started making notes about proposed release numbers at the > > top. For now, I'm only working with the projects that have been > > managed by the release team (have the "release:managed" tag in the > > governance repository), but it should be easy enough for other projects > > to use the same idea to pick a version number. > > Your script missed 2015.1 tags for some reason... > > I still think we should count the number of "integrated" releases > instead of the number of releases (basically considering pre-integration > releases as 0.x releases). That would give: > > ceilometer 5.0.0 > cinder 7.0.0 > glance 11.0.0 > heat 5.0.0 > horizon 8.0.0 > ironic 2.0.0 > keystone 8.0.0 > neutron* 7.0.0 > nova 12.0.0 > sahara 3.0.0 > trove 4.0.0 > > We also traditionally "managed" the previously-incubated projects. That > would add the following to the mix: > > barbican 1.0.0 > designate 1.0.0 > manila 1.0.0 > zaqar 1.0.0 > > -- > Thierry Carrez (ttx) > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -- Sincerely yours, Sergey Lukjanov Sahara Technical Lead (OpenStack Data Processing) Principal Software Engineer Mirantis Inc.
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
