Hi! On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 7:07 AM, Mark Boo <mrkzm...@gmail.com> wrote:
[snip] > Now my questions are: > > - Is this (file injection using image mounting) likely to be deprecated at > some point in the future? Yes, we've been building up to that for a long time and I can't see is not doing it. Its important because file injection is much harder to make secure. We've had security vulnerabilities around file injection in the past, and while I don't know of any at the moment we've decided its best just to move to the other two mechanisms. > - What functionality is missing (if any) in config drive / metadata service > solutions to completely replace file injection? None that I am aware of. In fact, these two other options provide you with more data than you'd get with file injection. > - Which of them is the fastest and most secure? I don't think there's a speed difference between the two of them -- they both use the same backend to gather the data to expose. That said, I think config drive is popular because its simple -- everyone knows how to use a local disks. Cheers, Michael -- Rackspace Australia __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
