On 6/10/15 3:26 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Hi Mike,
Thanks a lot for your quick reply which is very useful to me.
On 06/09/2015 07:08 PM, Mike Bayer wrote:
On 6/9/15 9:26 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Hi,
The python-sqlalchemy package has been uploaded to Debian Experimental,
and is about to be uploaded to Debian Unstable. So I wonder what's the
state of the project regarding upgrading SQLA.
Maybe Mike can tell what kind of issue we may run into? How much work
will it be to switch to SQLA 1.0.x for Liberty? Is it possible to be
compatible with both 9.x and 1.x (which would be the best way forward)?
The short answer is that there are no supported use cases that have been
intentionally changed in any backwards incompatible way in 1.0 and all
Openstack code should be able to accommodate from 0.9.x -> 1.0.x without
any change.
Ah, super cool!
I saw that this passed all tests:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/189847/
whew! :)
Could we get it approved?
Mike
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
