Hi, Dmitry, I guess the whole idea of new release models is NOT to tie projects to each > other any more except for The Big Release twice a year :) So I think no, we > don't need to. We still can do it, if we have something to release by the > time Ironic releases, but I suggest deciding it on case-by-case basis.
OK, I see. One more concern, about Tempest integration test which I will implement in V2.1.0, it seems like that we cannot add Ironic-inspector's tests into Tempest even if integration tests. Please see: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/YVR-QA-in-the-big-tent But I heard from you that Devananda thinks we need this in tempest itself. [3] Do you know something like current situation? Best Regards, Yuiko Takada 2015-06-09 15:59 GMT+09:00 Dmitry Tantsur <[email protected]>: > On 06/09/2015 03:49 AM, Yuiko Takada wrote: > >> Hi, Dmitry, >> >> Thank you for notifying. >> >> I've updated our summit etherpad [3] with whatever priorities I >> remembered, please have a look. I've also untargeted a few things in >> launchpad [4] (and will probably untarget more later on). Please >> assign yourself, if you want something done in this release time >> frame. >> >> I've assigned one item to myself in [3], and also I added one BP to [4], >> so please take a look. >> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ironic-inspector/+spec/delete-db-api >> > > Looks good, though I don't think it's a big priority for 2.0.0. Definitely > worth doing for 2.1.0. > > Thanks for assigning for tempest work, that's definitely a priority right > now. > > >> BTW, how do you think about Ironic-inspector's release model? >> You wrote "Version released with Ironic Liberty" as >> Ironic-inspector Version 2.1.0 in etherpad [3], >> but as you know, Ironic's release model has changed to feature >> releases.(right?) >> Should we make our release model same as Ironic? >> > > I guess the whole idea of new release models is NOT to tie projects to > each other any more except for The Big Release twice a year :) So I think > no, we don't need to. We still can do it, if we have something to release > by the time Ironic releases, but I suggest deciding it on case-by-case > basis. > > >> >> Best Regards, >> Yuiko Takada(Inspector team member) >> >> 2015-06-08 20:38 GMT+09:00 Dmitry Tantsur <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>>: >> >> >> Hello, Inspector team! >> >> The renaming process is going pretty well, the last thing we need to >> do is to get Infra approval and actual rename [1][2]. >> >> I'd like to allow people (e.g. myself) to start packaging inspector >> under it's new name, so I'd like to make 2.0.0 release as soon as >> possible (as opposed to scheduling it to particular date). All >> breaking changes should land by this release - I don't expect 3.0.0 >> soon :) >> >> I've updated our summit etherpad [3] with whatever priorities I >> remembered, please have a look. I've also untargeted a few things in >> launchpad [4] (and will probably untarget more later on). Please >> assign yourself, if you want something done in this release time >> frame. >> >> I would like 2.1.0 to be released with Ironic Liberty and be >> properly supported. >> >> Let me know what you think. >> >> Cheers, >> Dmitry >> >> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/188030/ >> [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/188798/ >> [3] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/liberty-ironic-discoverd >> [4] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ironic-inspector/+milestone/2.0.0 >> >> >> __________________________________________________________________________ >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Unsubscribe: >> [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe >> <http://[email protected]?subject:unsubscribe >> > >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> >> >> >> >> __________________________________________________________________________ >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Unsubscribe: >> [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> >> > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
