Two further thoughts on this:

1. Another DHCP agent problem that my team noticed is that it call_driver('reload_allocations') takes a bit of time (to regenerate the Dnsmasq config files, and to spawn a shell that sends a HUP signal) - enough so that if there is a fast steady rate of port-create and port-delete notifications coming from the Neutron server, these can build up in DHCPAgent's RPC queue, and then they still only get dispatched one at a time. So the queue and the time delay become longer and longer.

I have a fix pending for this, which uses an extra thread to read those notifications off the RPC queue onto an internal queue, and then batches the call_driver('reload_allocations') processing when there is a contiguous sequence of such notifications - i.e. only does the config regeneration and HUP once, instead of lots of times.

I don't think this is directly related to what you are seeing - but perhaps there actually is some link that I am missing.

2. There is an interesting and vaguely similar thread currently being discussed about the L3 agent (subject "L3 agent rescheduling issue") - about possible RPC/threading issues between the agent and the Neutron server. You might like to review that thread and see if it describes any problems analogous to your DHCP one.

Regards,
        Neil


On 08/06/15 17:53, Neil Jerram wrote:
My team has seen a problem that could be related: in a churn test where
VMs are created and terminated at a constant rate - but so that the
number of active VMs should remain roughly constant - the size of the
host and addn_hosts files keeps increasing.

In other words, it appears that the config for VMs that have actually
been terminated is not being removed from the config file.  Clearly, if
you have a limited pool of IP addresses, this can eventually lead to the
problem that you have described.

For your case - i.e. with Icehouse - the problem might be
https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1192381.  I'm not sure if the
fix for that problem - i.e. sending port-create and port-delete
notifications to DHCP agents even when the server thinks they are down -
was merged before the Icehouse release, or not.

But there must be at least one other cause as well, because my team was
seeing this with Juno-level code.

Therefore I, too, would be interested in any other insights about this
problem.

Regards,
     Neil



On 08/06/15 16:26, Daniel Comnea wrote:
Any help, ideas please?

Thx,
Dani

On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Daniel Comnea <comnea.d...@gmail.com
<mailto:comnea.d...@gmail.com>> wrote:

    + Operators

    Much thanks in advance,
    Dani




    On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 6:31 PM, Daniel Comnea <comnea.d...@gmail.com
    <mailto:comnea.d...@gmail.com>> wrote:

        Hi all,

        I'm running IceHouse (build using Fuel 5.1.1) on Ubuntu where
        dnsmask version 2.59-4.
        I have a very basic network layout where i have a private net
        which has 2 subnets

          2fb7de9d-d6df-481f-acca-2f7860cffa60 | private-net
                                    |
        e79c3477-d3e5-471c-a728-8d881cf31bee 192.168.110.0/24
        <http://192.168.110.0/24> |
        |
        |                                                         |
        f48c3223-8507-455c-9c13-8b727ea5f441 192.168.111.0/24
        <http://192.168.111.0/24> |

        and i'm creating VMs via HEAT.
        What is happening is that sometimes i get duplicated entries in
        [1] and because of that the VM which was spun up doesn't get
an ip.
        The Dnsmask processes are running okay [2] and i can't see
        anything special/ wrong in it.

        Any idea why this is happening? Or are you aware of any bugs
        around this area? Do you see a problems with having 2 subnets
        mapped to 1 private-net?



        Thanks,
        Dani

        [1]

/var/lib/neutron/dhcp/2fb7de9d-d6df-481f-acca-2f7860cffa60/addn_hosts

        [2]

        nobody    5664     1  0 Jun02 ?        00:00:08 dnsmasq
        --no-hosts --no-resolv --strict-order --bind-interfaces
        --interface=tapc9164734-0c --except-interface=lo

--pid-file=/var/lib/neutron/dhcp/2fb7de9d-d6df-481f-acca-2f7860cffa60/pid

--dhcp-hostsfile=/var/lib/neutron/dhcp/2fb7de9d-d6df-481f-acca-2f7860cffa60/host


--addn-hosts=/var/lib/neutron/dhcp/2fb7de9d-d6df-481f-acca-2f7860cffa60/addn_hosts


--dhcp-optsfile=/var/lib/neutron/dhcp/2fb7de9d-d6df-481f-acca-2f7860cffa60/opts

        --leasefile-ro --dhcp-authoritative
        --dhcp-range=set:tag0,192.168.110.0,static,86400s
        --dhcp-range=set:tag1,192.168.111.0,static,86400s
        --dhcp-lease-max=512 --conf-file= --server=10.0.0.31
        --server=10.0.0.32 --domain=openstacklocal





_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
openstack-operat...@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators


_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
openstack-operat...@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to