On 06/05/2015 09:34 AM, Alan Pevec wrote: >> If the downsteam consumer has their own extra patches ontop of the >> stable branch, then it seems D is even less useful than A. > > It is not - downstream (speaking for RDO) I would keep Version: > 2015.1.N where N is stable patch# so that we have a common reference > point with other distros. > Our patches, if any, then come on top this, so it's clear which > patches are added by distro. > > Cheers, > Alan > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > Yes, we use a revbump strategy here for patches and changing 2015.0.0-r10 or something. I think this is the standard way most distros signify changes from the base package.
-- Matthew Thode
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
