Hi Haikel! On 06/03/2015 06:28 PM, Haïkel wrote: > First, we all agree that we should move packaging recipes (to use a > neutral term) > and reviewing to upstream gerrit. That should *NOT* be delayed. > We (RDO) are even willing to transfer full control of the openstack-packages > namespace on github.
Thanks a lot! :) FYI, I'm also for having a separate namespace, just because adding more than 150 Git repositories at once in /openstack will be a huge mess. I don't really mind if it's called /openstack-packages or /openstack-pkg-deb or anything else, as long as we have consistency. > Then, about the infra/tooling things, it looks like a misunderstanding. > If we don't find an agreement on these topics, it's perfectly fine and > should not prevent moving to upstream gerrit > > So let's break the discussion in two parts. > > 1. upstream gerrit shared by everyone and get this started asap > 2. continue discussion about infra/tooling within the new project, without > presumin the outcome. > > Does it look like a good compromise to you? > > Regards, > H. I agree with what you wrote above. The tooling shouldn't be a blocker for the move to upstream Gerrit. We should decide on the tooling out of technically sound decisions that fits a given distribution. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
