On 02/06/15 01:51, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 06/01/2015 08:30 AM, John Garbutt wrote: >> On 1 June 2015 at 13:10, Flavio Percoco <fla...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> On 01/06/15 11:57 +0100, John Garbutt wrote: >>>>> On 26/05/15 13:54 -0400, Nikhil Komawar wrote: >>>> FWIW, moving Nova from glance v1 to glance v2, without breaking Nova's >>>> public API, will require someone getting a big chunk of glance v1 on >>>> top of glance v2. >>> >>> AFAIK, the biggest issue right now is "changed-since" which is >>> something Glance doesn't have in v2 but it's exposed throught Nova's >>> image API. >> I'm working on something in Glance related to this. >> Thats the big unanswered question that needs fixing in any spec we >> would approve around this effort. >> >>> I'm happy you brought this up. What are Nova's plans to adopt Glance's >>> v2 ? I heard there was a discussion and something along the lines of >>> creating a library that wraps both APIs came up. >> >> We don't have anyone who has stepped up to work on it at his point. >> >> I think the push you made around this effort in kilo is the latest >> updated on this: >> http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/specs/kilo/approved/remove-glanceclient-wrapper.html >> >> >> It would be great if we could find a glance/nova CPL to drive this >> effort. > > I am happy to take the lead on this from the Nova side. I'm familiar > with the code in Nova. > >>> I really think nova should put some more effort on helping this >>> happen. The work I did[0] - all red now, I swear it wasn't - during >>> Kilo didn't get enough attention even before we decided to push it >>> back. Not a complain, really. However, I'd love to see some >>> cross-project efforts on making this happen. >>> [0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/144875/ >> >> As there is no one to work on the effort, we haven't made it a >> priority for liberty. > > It's not a huge amount of work. I can do it. Yes, given the L release is just starting. I think we have enough time to make it happen. > >> If someone is able to step up to help complete the work, I can do my >> best to help get that effort reviewed, by raising its priority, just >> as we did in Kilo. >> >> I suspect looking at how to slowly move towards v2, rather than going >> for a "big bang" approach, will make this easier to land. That and >> solving how we implement "changed-since", if thats not available in >> the newer glance APIs. Honestly, part of me wonders about skipping v2, >> and going straight to v3. > > We actually already support Glance V2 in some things. It shouldn't be > too difficult to complete the work to fully support V2. > > Please assign me as the CPL for Glance from Nova. I'm happy to work with Jay for Nova from Glance :) > > Best, > -jay > > __________________________________________________________________________ > > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: > openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
-- Cheers & Best regards, Fei Long Wang (王飞龙) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Senior Cloud Software Engineer Tel: +64-48032246 Email: flw...@catalyst.net.nz Catalyst IT Limited Level 6, Catalyst House, 150 Willis Street, Wellington -------------------------------------------------------------------------- __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
