On 05/28/2015 05:14 PM, Fox, Kevin M wrote:
Thats like saying you should implement a sql engine inside of Berkeley DB since so many folks like sql... Not a good fit. If you want AMQP, get an AMQP server. Zaqar's intentionally lighter weight then that. Hardly any OpenStack services use but a fraction of AMQP though, so getting oslo.messaging to support that simple subset of AMQP on top of Zaqar is much more reasonable then getting Zaqar to support all of AMQP.
AMQP 1.0 is just a protocol for asynchronously transferring messages between processes. Supporting it doesn't require that zaqar provide any functionality that it doesn't want to. It is simply another protocol for accessing exactly the same service.
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
