On 5/15/15, 3:57 PM, "Dan Smith" <d...@danplanet.com> wrote:
>> The proposed patch also drops support for 5.0, which as I understand >> it is not EOL'd? The documentation appears to indicate that some >> functionality will not work with < 5.1, but it's not explicitly clear >> what that it is. > >Yeah, I guess I assumed that anyone on 5.0 was just late moving to >>=5.1, where people on 4.x might have a license standing in their way. > >Maybe refusing <5.0 and warning about <5.5 (which is what is now being >tested) is the right thing to do? That sounds reasonable to me. I would even go for as much as refusing below 5.1.0. It would be interesting to know if anyone is actually using below 5.1.0 > >--Dan > >__________________________________________________________________________ >OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
