-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 05/11/2015 01:49 PM, Everett Toews wrote:
> I’m agreed that this is not a good idea. I’d also invoke the > principle of least astonishment here. Because it’s a de facto > standard (so much so that some proxy in the middle may alter or > reject such a request), it would be surprising to developers to > allow such requests. > > REST APIs are difficult enough. Let’s avoid things with "no > defined semantics". Wise words. - -- - -- Ed Leafe -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVUSzzAAoJEKMgtcocwZqLt5QP/iZXNAsNjR5TSfdTTIeX4zpY U1NjVjR83AMmwLord9iFS2L2eOjkVWyNxCuxtVVK5yunYf3nRn3xNN/3WSDZezaf YRpAiKWmQrwT6wX2mNsegENxJbrgfkatXzhUsfrNrOc+Q+Y1YzYkbfVq1fmiHM28 FfkOCEOe/WZpWBG2hMcZfO++BBadLosYbYetSlwSgEGjy56epeGtpSeK/bnNxDCp R7ujKwP+QQuyUEEm6bqr/hqCS4ryzbVtSh8T1XCwiUcZ2LN4e4WIkNoZ5I3LWHm7 +ZUivYcQnTf+SdLqxk4QYriYf42Nz5XY6FhYhO9Kbxwfzdmj8y9PV4Jra8B5I0F4 bJ6Nw6X5x3lUarym9MCRV2qfFbfnvz4HwECNqG/1oyClGRRQkkFI8RPN665mHDtb JQBf+YxKmcPRu73kume2Kr/9I5YAA2hnqOQtTa8uuXCUHlftZ/OeXjB/pcDVW5U2 kLapxb6PoA4k5WEN4jtG2XcxonbwkGhxgRLA+ah3on2s9xMDl0EHJANnm7/PMuzp ZP0ln+66Gai/J48YNMw4dhV0sY/E2FC28mhrlS8TDwjE6UDAeaxTGL/HgkbcVdX7 A/FxJDco8Q1f53XtYBQ6vsV+t7y6MVauZxs7kp2clA7gJJSeFujb6w3AOA+Uct+l 7jq3kykx0rKin+NfoOR9 =EuC+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
