On 8 May 2015 at 23:23, Sean Dague <s...@dague.net> wrote: > On 05/08/2015 07:13 AM, Robert Collins wrote:
>> The resolver I have doesn't preserve the '1b' feature at all at this >> point, and we're going to need to find a way to separate out 'I want >> X' from 'I want X and I know better than you', which will let folk get >> into tasty tasty trouble (like we're in now). > > Gotcha, so, yes, so the subtleties of pip were lost here. > > Instead of using another tool, could we make a version of this job pull > and use the prerelease version of your pip code. Then we can run the > same tests and fix them in a non voting job against this code that has > not yet released. Thats certainly possible too. Upside: if it works we know it works in pip. Downside, we'll be tracking something that is in active development and late-prototype /early alpha stage. This is likely to be in pip 8.0 (7.0 should be out inside of a week). -Rob -- Robert Collins <rbtcoll...@hp.com> Distinguished Technologist HP Converged Cloud __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
