On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 07:22:24PM +0000, Nikhil Komawar wrote: > > This is a really nice idea.
Idea is indeed nice, but I have to fully agree with all of what Theirry says. > I feel the same, that we can offload some I personally don't feel it's about "offload"ing to some hypothetical person who'll magically understand (_and_ keep up) the detailed technical context across the projects to produce such a high-quality developer-oriented newsletter. Taking the venerable LWN as example, those who write most of the articles are folks who're technically very involved (not at a hand-wavy level, giving some directions) in Kernel and related projects. The thorough research completely shines through. It's more than a full-time job given the number of OpenStack projects, and assuming the the cadence of such a newsletter is once a month. > of the work from the liaisons and reduce the number of syncs that need > to happen. This can be a good source of asynchronous communication > however, I still feel that we need to keep a good balance of both. > Also, I like the proposed scope of the newsletter. [. . .] -- /kashyap __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
