On 05/05/15 05:29, Robert Collins wrote:
Probably, but it's legally wrong (ie: worst case, you can be sued) to leave
a package which is in direct violation of the license of things it contains.
So,we shouldn't use angular at all then, because as a js framework its
distributed to users when they use the website, but the license file
isn't included in that distribution.
Would be good to get a legal position on this.
If we're not allowed to use angular (and anybody else), I wonder how
anyone could use it (following above logic)
Angular.js is licensed under MIT License [1],[2]:
--------
The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in
all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
--------
question is, if our use of angular is a substantial portion if this
software.
Matthias
[1] https://angularjs.org/
[2] https://github.com/angular/angular.js/blob/master/LICENSE
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
