But I thought we set out to solve the problem of questions with -1's. That problem would be solved ;)
-amrith | -----Original Message----- | From: Ed Leafe [mailto:e...@leafe.com] | Sent: Friday, April 24, 2015 1:13 PM | To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org | Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [metrics] what answers do you expect from | counting comments? (was Re: Please stop reviewing code while asking | questions) | | -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- | Hash: SHA512 | | On 04/24/2015 11:50 AM, Amrith Kumar wrote: | | > I'm not interested in these numbers, personally (well, other than the | > usual fishing stories at summit after umpteen beers; I did 14 | > bazillion reviews in Kilo, how many did you do?). | > | > My concern (earlier in the thread) is that there is a metric. Once | > there's a metric someone attempts to use it to measure performance. | > And once someone uses a metric to measure performance, it influences | > behavior. | > | > If I propose that a +0 should now get counted, given how overloaded | > the CI is, I don't want the system to get abused by wanton 'recheck's | > which start to count towards performance. | | Be careful what you wish for; you just might get it... :) | | If people are going to game the system, changing a rule here or there | won't stop them. Now if +0 are counted, what's to stop someone from adding | +0s to every review? It won't affect the flow, and damn, they'll get to 14 | bazillion reviews without breaking a sweat! | | - -- | | - -- Ed Leafe | -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- | Version: GnuPG v2 | Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org | Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ | | iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVOnmUAAoJEKMgtcocwZqLpyMP/26agq1OyGLwFjQdp2tJN+yV | 1nX5m5Rv/OrraFlxIUOBapbiwnT0nwoOXEiHLW/7ofIJIML7uthFi5bSt0Hynmeq | 8rfRf+EEGuW0q7h4jgsBCsMD9idrn+ohsYVfqht6+P2co4kglz+VKX56EcRrm/Gx | tQO8dYZhe4ztBDe27KVwxKIAnbHSEqWCEH1PouP1/QFy0402SVtSaFfBh4FI7W8G | snHDV2aJywmNIHOoNJBanwWRLPQkxR2Z3chMVoHKMGu4T2PX8HLOeuyeSM5luEZL | ojpJad7ZZFwRlpYDZt+9hJ76rhur0btg6wbHzI6cIfMXVURWv9EXnWlqbFvTv8wc | BP7pwbbIV9MfGrlYdRSbVeXSRTXoHCLl/mUWShdx9XSbFu8Cf0E6vFjHDqA+mcF4 | n0zq2SPdoQ2/C1pWRSfHj7xPjRaGIUK4gCBKdOCkKpjGSYQG77QnVShQ0ZrzN/EG | SQYyyETVNohrgEdPdoY9wUPIXyd5Jvd5vLZ0iceGDRPdI9EmO/TJjR8oElwscYpc | PKIw0c9bgKEWbVaqMNltcCFixlxUDZqSjMxskS4/Yvbd3k/i89z0ezbiI1HGawmd | +pRKD7stG4ea5a1InRaKh8Qz3qPt4Itq6yxUE2DA7F7Jav3Cfa/nGxhlWL22FzTO | LCCUva3cpOMMqgMTN09I | =0NDE | -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- | | __________________________________________________________________________ | OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) | Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe | http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
