Le 24/04/2015 14:11, Russell Bryant a écrit :
On 04/24/2015 07:21 AM, Amrith Kumar wrote:
We had a hypothesis about why +0 was rarely used (never conclusively
proved). Our hypothesis was that since Stackalytics didn't count +0's
it led to an increased propensity to -1 something. It would be
wonderful if we could try the experiment of giving credit for 0's and
seeing if it changes behavior.
I think this makes a lot of sense. These stats really do drive
behavior. I'd certainly be open to a patch to reviewstats [1] to count
+0 comments and I think it would be good for stackalytics to consider
the same.
[1] http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/reviewstats
Just a question I have since a while... I know that Stackalytics and
reviewstats are not counting the same things for reviews (reviewstats is
definitely better because it counts all the comments, and not just if
I'm happy or not with a specific patchset). Could Stackalytics modify
its behaviour to mimic reviewstats ?
Ideally, Stackalytics should call the reviewstats API and reviewstats
should be hosted by infra IMHO (it"s already in the -infra namespace...)
so we could prevent duplicates.
2cts over that,
-Sylvain
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
