On Apr 22, 2015, at 9:31 PM, Devananda van der Veen <devananda....@gmail.com> wrote:
> Being a member of the technical committee is not merely a commitment of a few > hours a week; it is not just a forum for resolving differences between two or > three projects; and it's definitely not a social club or popularity contest. > > First and foremost, it is an elected body of representatives. I believe the > members should *represent* OpenStack's technical constituency -- both > internally and externally. On the one hand, that means listening to the > technical community, understanding the issues within and between projects, > being both willing and capable to jump in and address them when necessary; > and on the other hand, representing that constituency to the broader > community. Thanks for writing this, as well as your other points. I couldn't agree more with those sentiments. -- Ed Leafe
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
