The blueprint for this work appears to be https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/nested-quota-driver-api which shows it didn't make it into Nova in Kilo.
Looking at the reviews, I agree they didn't get enough attention, but there isn't a lot that we can do about that right now. We can revisit this in Liberty. Michael On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Daniel Comnea <comnea.d...@gmail.com> wrote: > I see this spec has been merged however can anyone point out if this will > make it into final Kilo release? > > Thanks, > Dani > > On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Tim Bell <tim.b...@cern.ch> wrote: >> >> Are we yet at the point in the New Year to register requests for >> exceptions ? >> >> >> >> There is strong interest from CERN and Yahoo! In this feature and there >> are many +1s and no unaddressed -1s. >> >> >> >> Thanks for consideration, >> >> >> >> Tim >> >> >> >> > Joe wrote >> >> > …. >> >> > >> >> >Nova's spec deadline has passed, but I think this is a good candidate for >> > an exception. We will announce the process for asking for a formal spec >> > exception shortly after new years. >> >> > >> >> >> >> From: Tim Bell [mailto:tim.b...@cern.ch] >> Sent: 23 December 2014 19:02 >> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Hierarchical Multitenancy >> >> >> >> Joe, >> >> >> >> Thanks… there seems to be good agreement on the spec and the matching >> implementation is well advanced with BARC so the risk is not too high. >> >> >> >> Launching HMT with quota in Nova in the same release cycle would also >> provide a more complete end user experience. >> >> >> >> For CERN, this functionality is very interesting as it allows the central >> cloud providers to delegate the allocation of quotas to the LHC experiments. >> Thus, from a central perspective, we are able to allocate N thousand cores >> to an experiment and delegate their resource co-ordinator to prioritise the >> work within the experiment. Currently, we have many manual helpdesk tickets >> with significant latency to adjust the quotas. >> >> >> >> Tim >> >> >> >> From: Joe Gordon [mailto:joe.gord...@gmail.com] >> Sent: 23 December 2014 17:35 >> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Hierarchical Multitenancy >> >> >> >> >> On Dec 23, 2014 12:26 AM, "Tim Bell" <tim.b...@cern.ch> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > It would be great if we can get approval for the Hierachical Quota >> > handling in Nova too (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/129420/). >> >> Nova's spec deadline has passed, but I think this is a good candidate for >> an exception. We will announce the process for asking for a formal spec >> exception shortly after new years. >> >> > >> > >> > >> > Tim >> > >> > >> > >> > From: Morgan Fainberg [mailto:morgan.fainb...@gmail.com] >> > Sent: 23 December 2014 01:22 >> > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Hierarchical Multitenancy >> > >> > >> > >> > Hi Raildo, >> > >> > >> > >> > Thanks for putting this post together. I really appreciate all the work >> > you guys have done (and continue to do) to get the Hierarchical >> > Mulittenancy >> > code into Keystone. It’s great to have the base implementation merged into >> > Keystone for the K1 milestone. I look forward to seeing the rest of the >> > development land during the rest of this cycle and what the other OpenStack >> > projects build around the HMT functionality. >> > >> > >> > >> > Cheers, >> > >> > Morgan >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> >> On Dec 22, 2014, at 1:49 PM, Raildo Mascena <rail...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Hello folks, My team and I developed the Hierarchical Multitenancy >> >> concept for Keystone in Kilo-1 but What is Hierarchical Multitenancy? What >> >> have we implemented? What are the next steps for kilo? >> >> >> >> To answers these questions, I created a blog post >> >> http://raildo.me/hierarchical-multitenancy-in-openstack/ >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Any question, I'm available. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> >> Raildo Mascena >> >> >> >> Software Engineer. >> >> >> >> Bachelor of Computer Science. >> >> >> >> Distributed Systems Laboratory >> >> Federal University of Campina Grande >> >> Campina Grande, PB - Brazil >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >> >> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > OpenStack-dev mailing list >> > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> > >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -- Rackspace Australia __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
