On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Fox, Kevin M <kevin....@pnnl.gov> wrote:
> So I would expect the number of folks needing to go from nova-network to > neutron to be a small number of clouds, not a big number. Changing the > defaults now to favor that small minority of clouds, seems like an odd > choice. > This is not the default for deployments, except for the ignorant people using DevStack for deployment and they have already self-selected for failure by doing that in the first place. > Really, I don't think finding the right solution to migrate those still > using nova-network to neutron has anything to do with what the default out > of the box experience for new clouds should be... > Honestly, I don't give a rat's a$$ about the migrations. But I do care about the knowledge required to mentally shift from nova-net to neutron. And we have failed there. DevStack has totally failed there to make Neutron usable without having to learn far too much to just get a dev cloud. Having linuxbridge be the default for folks moving from nova-network to > neutron might make much more sense then saying everyone should by default > get linuxbridge. > The complaint was about DevStack using LB as its default. I DO NOT want the overhead of OVS on my development VMs when I am not doing any network-related work. I am not alone here. Simple things MUST be simple to do. dt -- Dean Troyer dtro...@gmail.com
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
